In today's software engineering, the pursuit of excellence hinges on efficiency, quality, and innovation. Engineering metrics, particularly the transformative DORA (DevOps Research and Assessment) metrics, are pivotal in gauging performance. According to the 2023 State of DevOps Report, high-performing teams deploy code 46 times more frequently and are 2,555 times faster from commit to deployment than their low-performing counterparts.
However, true excellence extends beyond DORA metrics. Embracing a variety of metrics—including code quality, test coverage, infrastructure performance, and system reliability—provides a holistic view of team performance. For instance, organizations with mature DevOps practices are 24 times more likely to achieve high code quality, and automated testing can reduce defects by up to 40%.
This benchmark report offers comprehensive insights into these critical metrics, enabling teams to assess performance, set meaningful targets, and drive continuous improvement. Whether you're a seasoned engineering leader or a budding developer, this report is a valuable resource for achieving excellence in software engineering.
Leveraging the transformative power of large language models (LLMs) reshapes software engineering by automating and enhancing critical development workflows. The groundbreaking SWE-bench benchmark emerges as a game-changing evaluation framework, streamlining how we assess language models' capabilities in resolving real-world GitHub issues. However, the original SWE-bench dataset presents significant challenges that impact reliable assessment—including unsolvable tasks that skew results and data contamination risks where models encounter previously seen training data during evaluation. These obstacles create unreliable performance metrics and hinder meaningful progress in advancing AI-driven software development.
Addressing these critical concerns, SWE-bench Verified transforms the evaluation landscape as a meticulously human-validated subset that revolutionizes benchmark reliability. This enhanced framework focuses on real-world software issues that undergo comprehensive review processes, ensuring each task remains solvable and contamination-free. By providing a robust and accurate evaluation environment, SWE-bench Verified empowers researchers and practitioners to precisely measure language models' true capabilities in software engineering contexts, ultimately accelerating breakthroughs in how AI systems resolve real-world GitHub issues and contribute to transformative software development practices.
Velocity refers to the speed at which software development teams deliver value. The Velocity metrics gauge efficiency and effectiveness in delivering features and responding to user needs. This includes:
Quality represents the standard of excellence in development processes and code quality, focusing on reliability, security, and performance. It ensures that products meet user expectations, fostering trust and satisfaction. Quality metrics include:
Throughput measures the volume of features, tasks, or user stories delivered, reflecting the team's productivity and efficiency in achieving objectives. Key throughput metrics are:
Collaboration signifies the cooperative effort among software development team members to achieve shared goals. It entails effective communication and collective problem-solving to deliver high-quality software products efficiently. Collaboration metrics include:
The benchmarks are organized into the following levels of performance for each metric:
These levels help teams understand where they stand in comparison to others and identify areas for improvement.
The data in the report is compiled from over 1,500 engineering teams and more than 2 million pull requests across the US, Europe, and Asia. The full dataset includes a comprehensive set of data points, ensuring robust benchmarking and accurate performance evaluation. This comprehensive data set ensures that the benchmarks are representative and relevant.
Transforming how we assess large language models in software engineering demands a dynamic and practical evaluation framework that mirrors real-world challenges. SWE-bench has emerged as the go-to benchmark that revolutionizes this assessment process, offering teams a powerful way to dive into how effectively language models tackle authentic software engineering scenarios. During the SWE-bench evaluation workflow, models receive comprehensive codebases alongside detailed problem descriptions—featuring genuine bug reports and feature requests sourced directly from active GitHub repositories. The language model then generates targeted code patches that streamline and resolve these issues.
This innovative approach enables direct measurement of a model's capability to analyze complex software engineering challenges and deliver impactful solutions that enhance development workflows. By focusing on real-world software issues that developers encounter daily, SWE-bench ensures evaluations remain grounded in practical scenarios that truly matter. Consequently, SWE-bench has transformed into the essential standard for benchmarking large language models within software engineering contexts, empowering development teams and researchers to optimize their models and accelerate progress throughout the field.
Software engineering agents comprise a revolutionary class of intelligent systems that harness the power of large language models to streamline and automate diverse software engineering tasks, ranging from identifying and resolving complex bug fixes to implementing sophisticated new features across codebases. These advanced agents integrate a robust language model with an intricate scaffolding system that orchestrates the entire interaction workflow—dynamically generating contextual prompts, interpreting nuanced model outputs, and coordinating the comprehensive development process. The scaffolding architecture enables these agents to maintain context awareness, execute multi-step reasoning, and adapt their approaches based on project-specific requirements and constraints.
The performance metrics of software engineering agents on established benchmarks like SWE-bench demonstrate significant variability, influenced by both the underlying language model's capabilities and the sophistication level of the scaffolding infrastructure that supports their operations. Recent breakthrough advances in language model architectures have catalyzed substantial improvements in how these intelligent agents tackle real-world software engineering challenges, enabling them to understand complex codebases, generate contextually appropriate solutions, and integrate seamlessly with existing development workflows. Consequently, software engineering agents have evolved into increasingly sophisticated tools capable of addressing intricate programming problems, making them indispensable assets for modern development teams seeking to optimize productivity, reduce manual overhead, and accelerate their software delivery pipelines while maintaining high code quality standards.
AI-driven evaluation of large language models on software engineering tasks has reshaped how we assess these powerful systems, yet several transformative opportunities and evolving challenges continue to emerge in this rapidly advancing field. One of the most critical considerations is data contamination, where AI models inadvertently leverage training datasets that overlap with evaluation benchmarks. This phenomenon can dramatically amplify performance metrics and mask the genuine capabilities these cutting-edge systems possess. Additionally, the SWE-bench dataset, while offering comprehensive coverage, may require enhanced diversity to fully capture the intricate complexity and extensive variety that characterizes real-world software engineering challenges.
Another evolving aspect is that current AI-powered benchmarks often concentrate on streamlined task sets, such as automated bug resolution, which may not encompass the broader spectrum of dynamic challenges that software engineering professionals encounter daily. Consequently, AI systems that demonstrate exceptional performance on these focused benchmarks may struggle to generalize across other mission-critical tasks, such as innovative feature implementation or managing unexpected edge cases that emerge in production environments. Addressing these transformative challenges proves essential to ensure that AI-driven evaluations of language models deliver both precision and meaningful insights, ultimately enabling these sophisticated systems to effectively tackle real-world software engineering scenarios with unprecedented accuracy and reliability.
Engineering metrics serve as a cornerstone for performance measurement and improvement. By leveraging these metrics, teams can gain deeper insights into their processes and make data-driven decisions. This helps in:
Engineering metrics provide a valuable framework for benchmarking performance against industry standards. This helps teams:
Metrics also play a crucial role in enhancing team collaboration and communication. By tracking collaboration metrics, teams can:
The software engineering landscape is positioned to undergo comprehensive transformation through the strategic implementation of advanced large language models and sophisticated software engineering agents. These AI-driven technologies analyze vast datasets and facilitate automated processes that streamline development workflows across the industry. As these intelligent systems dive into increasingly complex programming challenges, they enhance efficiency and optimize resource allocation throughout development cycles. However, achieving optimal performance requires systematic efforts to address critical challenges such as data contamination issues and the imperative need for comprehensive, diverse benchmarks that accurately represent real-world scenarios.
The SWE-bench ecosystem, encompassing initiatives like SWE-bench Verified and complementary projects, serves as a pivotal framework for facilitating this technological evolution. By implementing reliable, human-validated benchmarks and establishing rigorous evaluation protocols, the development community can ensure that language models and software engineering agents deliver meaningful enhancements to production software development processes. As these AI-powered tools analyze historical data patterns and predict optimal development strategies, they empower development teams to tackle ambitious projects with unprecedented efficiency, streamline complex workflows, and fundamentally reshape the boundaries of what's achievable in modern software engineering practices.
Delivering quickly isn't easy. It's tough dealing with technical challenges and tight deadlines. But leaders in engineering guide their teams well. They encourage creativity and always look for ways to improve. Metrics are like helpful guides. They show us where we're doing well and where we can do better. With metrics, teams set goals and see how they measure up to others. It's like having a map to success.
With strong leaders, teamwork, and using metrics wisely, engineering teams can overcome challenges and achieve great things in software engineering. This Software Engineering Benchmarks Report provides valuable insights into their current performance, empowering them to strategize effectively for future success. Predictability is essential for driving significant improvements. A consistent workflow allows teams to make steady progress in the right direction.
By standardizing processes and practices, teams of all sizes can streamline operations and scale effectively. This fosters faster development cycles, streamlined processes, and high-quality code. Typo has saved significant hours and costs for development teams, leading to better quality code and faster deployments.
You can start building your metrics today with Typo for FREE. Our focus is to help teams ship reliable software faster.
Implement engineering metrics, gather SDLC insights & set continuous improvement goals in your dev teams.
Try Live Demo
